NJ: Exception to the American Rule for Successful Insureds

Guarantee Insurance Co. v. Saltman, 217 N.J. Super. 604, (App. Div. 1987)

NJ Underlying Legal Malpractice Action

Student Contributor: Colleen Gaedcke

Facts: A few months after obtaining professional malpractice coverage from the plaintiff, one of the partners at the defendant law firm was served with a legal malpractice complaint. The defendant submitted the complaint to the plaintiff who provided a defense under a reservation of rights to disclaim pending an investigation of any misrepresentation by the law firm on its application for coverage. This investigation ultimately revealed that the defendant law firm did not have knowledge of the malpractice claim at the time it submitted its application.

Despite the results of its own investigation, however, plaintiff moved to disclaim its duty to defend and indemnify the firm for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations and intentionally withholding information concerning the malpractice action. Additionally, plaintiff sought reimbursement for all defense costs.

The law firm, in turn, filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff arguing that it owed a defense and indemnity for the pending malpractice claim, and furthermore, sought indemnification for all legal fees incurred in defending the plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action. The court found that the plaintiff’s policy with the defendant was valid and required plaintiff to provide a defense and indemnity in the malpractice action. Moreover, under Court Rule 4:42-9(a)(6), the law firm was awarded a significant portion of the legal fees it incurred in defending the declaratory judgment action.

Issue: Can an insured recover counsel fees from an insurer for costs and expenditures incurred in defending an insurer’s disclaimer of coverage?

Ruling: Under the American Rule, a prevailing party cannot collect attorney’s fees from the losing party. The New Jersey Supreme Court has, however, carved out an exception to this Rule in R. 4:42-9(a)(6) for an insured who is forced to litigate for its policy benefits against an insurer who erroneously disclaims coverage under a liability or indemnity policy of insurance.

Lesson: New Jersey Courts recognize that counsel fees must be awarded to insureds in order to make certain that they are receiving the full value of the coverage afforded by liability and indemnity policies in instances where an insurer’s disclaimer is not supported by the policy’s exclusions, conditions, or limitations on coverage.

Allocation of Attorney's Fees in a Legal Malpractice Action

Grubbs v. Knoll,
376 N.J. Super. 420, 870 A.2d 713 (App. Div. 2005)

Student Contributor:  Cheryl Neuman

NJ Underlying real estate transaction

Facts: Plaintiff was involved in a real estate transaction wherein the Defendant and his real estate agent failed to disclose evidence revealing that the real estate was situated above wetlands, which would result in building and construction limitations. Plaintiff's attorney similarly failed to bring this critical information to light.  Upon learning of these constraints, Plaintiff sued the Defendant for common law fraud, the Defendant’s real estate agent for violation of the Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA"), and his own lawyer for legal malpractice. The jury awarded the plaintiff $75,650 in compensatory damages for common law fraud, consumer fraud, and legal malpractice and allocated 60% of the liability for compensatory damages to the broker, 30% to vendors, and 10% to plaintiff’s counsel.  The trial court increased the damages under the CFA to $226,950. The plaintiff settled with the defendant for $20,000 and with the real estate agent for $500,000. The malpractice claim, however, did not settle, and plaintiff subsequently sued the allegedly negligent attorney for reimbursement of attorney's fees incurred in the malpractice action.  

Issue: Will a negligent attorney sued for malpractice be liable for the legal fees incurred by his former client in the malpractice action?  

Ruling: As a general rule, New Jersey Courts ascribe to the American Rule:  there is no fee shifting between parties irrespective of who prevails.  Legal malpractice cases, however, are an exception.  Legal fees incurred by a former client in a legal malpractice action are considered additional compensatory damages in instances where the client prevails.  The Grubbs Court found that the negligent attorney was liable for one-third of the attorney's fees and costs incurred by his former client in the malpractice action. 

Lesson: A negligent attorney is responsible for the reasonable legal expenses, costs, and attorney's fees incurred by a former client in prosecuting the legal malpractice action against the negligent attorney.